Page 18 of 78 FirstFirst ... 8 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 28 68 ... LastLast
Results 256 to 270 of 1174

Thread: Pigpen

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Tommy sucks Sharpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Corpus Christi
    Posts
    8,826
    I wasnt thinking about using the square tube for the front, just the boatsiding. The front is going to be done in either 1 1/2 or 2" tube.
    On the 8th day god created the Super Swamper TSL and said "go forth and kick ass"

  2. #2
    Tommy sucks Sharpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Corpus Christi
    Posts
    8,826
    Well I've been thinking about my radiator situation for when I taper the front. The stock 6.2 radiator is HUGE. It extends past the opening in the core support about 6" on the driver's side. This poses a problem, because of the way the radiator is mounted. Since its offset, I wouldnt be able to narrow both sides all the way into the body mount, and that would look stupid. Centering it would be a ***** because the little ears that hold the rubber bushings in place are offset, I could probably fab up some new ones without too much trouble though.

    On other option that I considered was getting a custom 5 or 6 core radiator made that is narrower, so it will fit between th ebody mounts. Kopecki seems to think I should make it narrow enought to drop down between the frame rails so I can lower my hood and increase my visibility, but I think narrowing it that much will make it too small to adequetly cool the 6.2. I do however, want to lower the hood if at all possible, because I cant see **** over it on climbs and am afraid I am going to run over my spotter eventually, and good spotters are hard to replace.

    I was brainstorming over potential ideas, then I remembered that on C/K series chevy trucks (88-99, the body style like my crewcab), their radiators are 2" shorter than the older boxy models like pigpen. Since when I narrow the front the fenders are going to have to be kludged to the core support anyway, I was thinking of taking a core support and radiator from a C/K truck and putting in on the front of pigpen, then cutting a couple of inches off the large lip on the front of my hood to lower it a total of 4" or so. I can probably make the fenders angle downward to match it and make it look decent. The later model core support will require some ethnic thinking and a little fabrication but shouldnt be too hard. I might even grab a later model grill to stick on there.
    On the 8th day god created the Super Swamper TSL and said "go forth and kick ass"

  3. #3
    dyskrasia CRaSHnBuRN's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2002
    Location
    Pearland Tx
    Posts
    3,766
    rear mounted radiator? Not like you have much back there anyway, and then you could put your winch where the radiator was and get a better approach angle.

  4. #4
    Tommy sucks Sharpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Corpus Christi
    Posts
    8,826
    I've thought about that, but it would be alot more work. It is still a consideration though. The way the winch is mounted now, it does not hurt my approach angle at all. It is 95% inside the stock frame and sits about 3/4" in front of the radiator.
    On the 8th day god created the Super Swamper TSL and said "go forth and kick ass"

  5. #5
    D-FENS agjohn02's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Cowtown
    Posts
    11,900
    summit aluminum

  6. #6
    .
    Join Date
    Oct 2002
    Location
    Poth, Tx
    Posts
    4,913
    Is it really that hard to cool a 130 hp motor?

  7. #7
    Tommy sucks Sharpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Corpus Christi
    Posts
    8,826
    I dont know but I'm sure chevy put the biggest radiator they made in front of it for a reason.
    On the 8th day god created the Super Swamper TSL and said "go forth and kick ass"

  8. #8
    Registered User uglyota's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2002
    Location
    .
    Posts
    12,659
    because they expected you to be towing with it, perhaps?
    Quote Originally Posted by Shaggy View Post
    damnit... if everyone is leaving i want my original 15 back... i dont wanna be left with these tools

  9. #9
    Buckaroo Bonzai!!! Reckless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    BFE, Tejas
    Posts
    3,655
    the rule of thumb is one cube per cube of displacement so what im trying to say is that 6.2 is around 370-380 (im too lazy to do the math)cubic inches so you need a radiatior with the same dimentions. thats what they use in heavy truck so its should be the same. Its not the same with gas b/c diesel puts out more heat than gas.

  10. #10
    Tommy sucks Sharpe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Location
    Corpus Christi
    Posts
    8,826
    6.2 is 379. So according to your rule of thumb the radiator GM uses in front of the 6.2 is approximately 32x18x2 which equals 1152 cubic inches. Something about that doesnt sound right to me.
    On the 8th day god created the Super Swamper TSL and said "go forth and kick ass"

  11. #11
    Rawr TexTJ209's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Waco, Tx
    Posts
    3,606
    Should be 1 square inch of radiator surface area for every one cubic inch of engine.
    '73 J2000 Thriftside Gladiator, 258/T14/D20
    '81 CJ7 Laredo, 258/T176/D300

  12. #12
    Regsitered Uesr JeepPhisherman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2002
    Location
    Austin, TX
    Posts
    5,040
    Quote Originally Posted by TexTJ209
    Should be 1 square inch of radiator surface area for every one cubic inch of engine.

    then it still works out the same for his rad. unless you only count the front side

  13. #13
    Rawr TexTJ209's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Waco, Tx
    Posts
    3,606
    Quote Originally Posted by JeepPhisherman
    then it still works out the same for his rad. unless you only count the front side

    Yeah, its not the total surface area, but rather the area that gets exposed to the airflow. The numbers are for the front only..
    '73 J2000 Thriftside Gladiator, 258/T14/D20
    '81 CJ7 Laredo, 258/T176/D300

  14. #14
    Buckaroo Bonzai!!! Reckless's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    BFE, Tejas
    Posts
    3,655
    Quote Originally Posted by TexTJ209
    Yeah, its not the total surface area, but rather the area that gets exposed to the airflow. The numbers are for the front only..
    Exactly, i had lunch on the mind at the time.

  15. #15
    Teaching America's youth RCcola55's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    with your mom
    Posts
    2,815
    rear radiator, thus allowing a smaller one because extra length of hose that it would add would help cool it and you are adding extra coolant along with it
    Ryan Clarke
    (214)695-7901

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •