Suckin' on all those rice fumes for all those years has got the boys grey matter all mushy. :rolleyes:
:D
Printable View
aahhh that makes things different...
dana 60 out of an 89 F350 is kingpin correct?
and same truck should have sterling rear axle correct?
si
I thought it was balljoint, like tates. Actually, Tate's is balljoint and I thought it was that old, so take that as you will. Either way, would a non king pin be a deal breaker with the high strength axles and u joints these days?
Tate's was 92+
good or bad idea?
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y60...kn/shackle.jpg
Bad on foolsize from my research look in my Bandit thread. Lots of opinions and tech on that shackle design because i looked into the same idea.
It's not street friendly at all, you will need some type of stabilizer more than likely if you plan on driving it safely down the blacktop...
I agreed, muck like revolver and those hinged shackles it just gives you a little more unusable flex. Rubber bushings have enough play that they work great
revolvers don't affect street performance at all, but their usefulness is debatable.
Asking all 9" gurus.
What years did Ford/Lincoln continentals come with a 9"? Availability? I heard these were the best housings to start with. Any other advice on junk yard 9" finds.
Umm....pickups?;)
I think the car 9"s would be too much hassle. You'd have to torch all the link bracketry and redrill the axles (they had a 5 on 5" pattern I believe).
well, I'm tempted to do this. . .
http://www.bc4x4.com/tech/2002/ff9/